Case 2602258/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Adams v Better Futures Multi-Academy Trust CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602258/2022
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe supplied document is a certificate of correction rather than a substantive reasons judgment. It states that, under Rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the judgment sent to the parties on 9 May 2023 was corrected on 15 May 2023.
The correction was limited to paragraph 59, where the name of person C was replaced with the letter C in accordance with the Anonymisation Order. The document confirms that the appeal and review time limits were unchanged and continued to run from the date of the original judgment.
No findings on the underlying breach of contract or unfair dismissal claims, and no remedy figures, appear in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The provided text is a certificate of correction only. It states that the judgment sent to the parties on 9 May 2023 was corrected under Rule 69 to replace the name of person C in paragraph 59 with the letter C. No substantive claim outcome is stated in the supplied text. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 69
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.