Case 2602268/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Williams v L A Steeplejacks Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602268/2019
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Clark recorded that the claimant, Mr G Williams, succeeded on all matters dealt with in the decision. The respondent, L A Steeplejacks Limited, was ordered to pay £942.27 for an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal also found that, at the date of termination, the respondent was in breach of the claimant’s contract of employment in respect of repayment of expenses. Damages for that breach were assessed at £276.10.
On the dismissal claim, the tribunal stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. It awarded a basic award of £12,337.50 and a compensatory award of £18,567.93. No separate reasons beyond the bare conclusions appear in the extracted text, and no further legal test is stated in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £942.27 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £942 |
| Breach of contract | At termination, the respondent was found to be in breach of contract in respect of repayment of expenses, and damages of £276.10 were ordered. | Upheld | — | £276 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a basic award and compensatory award; the judgment does not separate the unfair dismissal award into further claim-specific components beyond those two figures. | Upheld | — | £30,905 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,124
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £12,338
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £18,568
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.