Case 2602270/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Watkinson v Mr S Sriranganathan — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602270/2021
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Varnam Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Watkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs C Watkinson, brought a claim of unlawful deductions from wages against Mr S Sriranganathan. The matter was listed for hearing on 22 June 2022 by CVP. The tribunal recorded that a notice of hearing was sent on 28 May 2022, that both parties were also sent a CVP enquiry letter and form on the same date, and that the claimant responded on 12 June 2022 confirming she was able to attend by videolink.
The tribunal found that the claimant therefore knew or ought to have known that the hearing was listed for 10am on 22 June 2022 and would proceed by CVP. A further email on 20 June 2022 attached the CVP notice, joining link and instructions, and the tribunal was satisfied this should have been received by the claimant at the email address used in her ET1 and in communications with the tribunal. Neither party joined by 9.30am, as instructed, or by 10.35am, when the claim was dismissed. The tribunal clerk attempted to telephone the claimant but the number provided was invalid, and there was no recorded contact from either party to explain their absence.
Because the claimant did not attend to give evidence, the tribunal said she could not discharge the burden of proof on the facts of the case. It therefore dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive finding was made on the underlying wage complaint and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after neither party attended; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.