Case 2602286/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Walter v Katie Homes Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602286/2018
- Decision date
- 19 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Walter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham on 13 June 2019 by Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone. The claimant, Miss E Walter, was in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The written record of judgment is dated 19 June 2019.
The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn after the claimant accepted that she did not have the necessary two years' qualifying service. The sex discrimination claim was also withdrawn. No merits findings were made on either of those claims in this decision.
The tribunal then dealt with the remaining claims, described as breach of contract (notice pay) and a claim for outstanding wages and possibly holiday pay. It held that it had not been reasonably practicable for those claims to have been presented in time, and that they had been presented within a reasonable period thereafter, so they were permitted to proceed. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal after the claimant accepted she did not have the necessary 2 years' qualifying service. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the remaining breach of contract claim for notice pay was permitted to proceed because it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time and it had been presented within a reasonable period thereafter. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the remaining claim for outstanding wages and possibly holiday pay was permitted to proceed because it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time and it had been presented within a reasonable period thereafter. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- 2 years' qualifying service
- not reasonably practicable / reasonable period of time thereafter
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.