Case 2602288/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds 4 claims against Tempus Housing Limited
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £14,836. The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,230.
- Case reference
- 2602288/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Ms S Thompson against Tempus Housing Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £14,836.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,230. In a further breach of contract finding, the tribunal held that the respondent had not reimbursed claims for expenses and ordered damages of £562.38.
The tribunal additionally found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,051.12. The hearing listed for 22 October 2019 was cancelled. The judgment records no discrimination issues, no panel members, and no separate award structure beyond the sums ordered on each head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £14,836 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,230. | Upheld | — | £1,230 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract for failure to reimburse expenses and awarded damages of £562.38. | Upheld | — | £562 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,051.12. | Upheld | — | £1,051 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,680
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.