Case 2602300/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Miss M Athwal v Nottingham Castle Trust — 2023

Case reference: 2602300/2022
Decision date: 15 February 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Broughton Dated

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss M Athwal

Respondent

Nottingham Castle Trust

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a case management order dated 17 January 2023, the Tribunal gave the Respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out, on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the Respondent failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment does not contain any findings on the underlying merits of the claim, and it does not record any compensatory or other monetary award.

The Tribunal noted that the Respondent remained entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but could only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment strikes out the Respondent's response after a case management order gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. It does not record a substantive determination of the underlying claim on the merits.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.