Case 2602307/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Fenwick v Coach Pro UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602307/2021
- Decision date
- 11 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Fenwick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 11 February 2022 before Employment Judge Heap sitting alone. The claimant, Mr J Fenwick, was represented by a law student. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. It ordered Coach Pro UK Limited to pay Mr Fenwick £765.00, less any necessary deductions for tax.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unpaid accrued holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay a further £289.74, less any necessary deductions for tax. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £765.00 less any necessary deductions for tax. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £289.74 less any necessary deductions for tax. | Upheld | — | £290 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,055
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.