Case 2602315/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Chodzynska v Bluewood Recruitment Limited Heard: via Cloud Video Platform in the Midlands (East) Region — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602315/2022
- Decision date
- 27 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Chodzynska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Chodzynska was employed by Bluewood Recruitment Limited, trading as Bluewood Healthcare, from 13 November 2020 to 24 April 2022. She said she was owed about £500 for April 2022 and brought claims for unlawful deduction from wages and, in the alternative, a statutory redundancy payment. The hearing was held by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Ayre on 27 January 2023, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that the relevant payment date was at the end of April 2022 and that, even allowing for early conciliation, the time limit expired on 31 July 2022. The claim was not presented until 10 October 2022, which was more than two months late. The judge accepted that the claimant had contacted ACAS in May 2022 and understood she wanted to make a claim, but found there was no good reason why she could not have issued proceedings earlier, because she knew of her right to claim and could have found out about the time limits and procedure.
The tribunal therefore held that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the unlawful deduction claim in time and that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. The redundancy payment claim was presented within six months of the termination date and was therefore in time, but it failed on the substance because the claimant's continuous employment lasted less than 18 months, which was below the two-year qualifying period in section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. That claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim was out of time and that it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. The claimant said she was seeking about £500 for unpaid April 2022 wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claim was in time but dismissed it because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment, so she had no right to a statutory redundancy payment under s.155 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Rodgers v Bodfari (Transport) Ltd
- Radakovits v Abbey National plc
- s.155 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.