Case 2602324/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Holland v Virtual Motors Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602324/2018
- Decision date
- 18 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Holland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against Virtual Motors Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,116.39 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £360.18 gross. No additional factual findings or legal reasoning are recorded in the extracted judgment beyond those orders.
The hearing listed for 12/03/2019 was cancelled. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge P Britton and gives the decision date as 18 February 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,116.39 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,116 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £360.18 for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,477
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.