Case 2602335/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Maher v Mr Ashley Cox — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602335/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Maher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 23 September 2021 and was determined under Rule 21 because the respondent, Mr Ashley Cox, failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Clark Date recorded that a determination could properly be made on the papers.
On the substance, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Ms P Maher's wages and ordered payment of £200 gross. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,305.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £442.80. The judgment stated that the respondent must pay £1,947.80 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,305 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to the claimant's holiday entitlement; classified here as holiday_pay. | Upheld | — | £443 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,948
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.