Case 2602336/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr John Sissons First v Stelco Europa Ltd (In liquidation) Second Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602336/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr John Sissons First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented by the first respondent, so judgment was entered against it under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The second respondent filed a response which the tribunal treated as written submissions under Rule 42. Employment Judge Millns sat alone at Nottingham by CVP on 22 March 2022.
The claimant succeeded in his statutory redundancy payment claim under s.166 ERA 1996 and was awarded £13,872 against the second respondent. He also succeeded in claims for unauthorised deduction from wages (£11,250 gross) and holiday pay (£10,250.01 gross). For those claims, the tribunal ordered split payments between the second respondent and the first respondent, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance, with the second respondent paying £4,352 and £3,264 respectively and the first respondent paying £6,898 and £6,986.01 respectively.
The tribunal found that the first respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay employer pension contributions, awarding £337.50, and that it breached the contract by dismissing the claimant without notice. Notice pay was assessed at £10,676.52 net, again split between the respondents as £4,704 from the second respondent and £5,972.52 from the first respondent. The claim under sections 123-125 of the Pensions Scheme Act 1993 was withdrawn and dismissed. The first respondent was also found to have unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code, so a 25% uplift of £3,471 was added to its liabilities for the wages and holiday pay awards. The monetary awards recorded in the judgment total £49,857.03, before any deductions on the gross sums where ordered.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment under s.166 ERA 1996 against the second respondent. | Upheld | — | £13,872 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross wages amount; the judgment orders payment to be split between the respondents after deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £11,250 |
| Holiday pay | Gross holiday pay amount; the judgment orders payment to be split between the respondents after deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £10,250 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £338 |
| Other | Claim under sections 123-125 of the Pensions Scheme Act 1993, withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissal without notice; notice pay assessed at £10,676.52 net and split between the respondents. | Upheld | — | £10,677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £49,857
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.