Case 2602337/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Kiff v IRubber Limited, trading as Invincible Rubber — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602337/2019
- Decision date
- 25 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Kiff
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Camp struck out Mrs N Kiff's unfair dismissal complaint on 25 September 2019. The reasons record that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim unless special circumstances apply, and the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, for why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaint for notice pay was not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996 because the claimant had less than two years' service and no special circumstances appeared to apply. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.