Case 2602349/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Stirk v Everyman Motor Racing Activities Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602349/2022
- Decision date
- 1 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Stirk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 January 2023, the tribunal gave Ms S Stirk an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, on the grounds that she had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 3 November 2022 and had not actively pursued the case. The tribunal recorded that she did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Ayre struck out the claim. The judgment states that the hearing listed for 10 February 2023 would not take place. No substantive determination of the underlying claim was made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing after the letter dated 24 January 2023. The strike out followed non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 3 November 2022 and the finding that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.