Case 2602350/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs CA Fuller v SSB Care Homes Ltd (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602350/2018
- Decision date
- 19 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs CA Fuller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that SSB Care Homes Ltd was in administration. It held that neither the consent of the administrator nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
On 10 February 2020 the tribunal gave Mrs Fuller an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason, and the tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment contains no merits findings and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive claim type(s). It records only that 'the claim' was struck out because the respondent was in administration and the required consent of the administrator or permission of the court had not been obtained, and because the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.