Case 2602355/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Major v The Saints School — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602355/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Major
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 June 2023, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why its response should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the response had not been actively pursued and that the respondent had failed to reply to correspondence from the tribunal or comply with tribunal orders.
The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge M Butler therefore struck out the response on 22 June 2023. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any future hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
This judgment does not record a substantive liability finding or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the respondent's response was struck out for not being actively pursued and for failing to reply to tribunal correspondence or comply with tribunal orders. The gov.uk listing context describes the case as Unfair Dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.