Case 2602359/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Patel v Arriva Midlands Limited FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602359/2022
- Decision date
- 24 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing took place on 23 December 2024 at Nottingham Tribunal Hearing Centre, heard remotely by telephone before Employment Judge Shore. The claimant, Mr M Patel, appeared in person and the respondent, Arriva Midlands Limited, was represented by counsel. The judgment amended the respondent's name to Arriva Midlands Limited.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of breach of contract under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994 was dismissed upon withdrawal, and the judgment states that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. The claimant's defamation claim was also dismissed upon withdrawal for lack of jurisdiction, and the claim for 'other payments' was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The claimant's victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 was likewise dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not record any determination on the substantive merits of any claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim brought under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Defamation claim. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for 'other payments'. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | Claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.