Case 2602360/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Purewal v 365 Vacuum Excavation Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602360/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Purewal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 19 January 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr J Purewal an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety. The hearing fixed for 3 February 2023 was cancelled and did not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety. The underlying head of claim is taken from the case listing/context; the judgment text itself does not specify separate pleaded claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety. The underlying head of claim is taken from the case listing/context; the judgment text itself does not specify separate pleaded claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.