Case 2602362/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Beamond v Sheridon UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602362/2021
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Beamond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote video hearing on 4 February 2022 before Employment Judge Victoria Butler sitting alone, the Respondent accepted that it owed the amounts claimed by Mr G Beamond. The body of the decision does not set out the underlying facts in detail or break the claim into separate heads within the judgment itself.
The tribunal held that the claim had been presented out of time and that it was not reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. On that basis, the claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the Respondent accepted that it owed the amounts claimed, but the claim was presented out of time and was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The text does not separately discuss this head from any other claim head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment says the Respondent accepted that it owed the amounts claimed, but the claim was presented out of time and was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The text does not separately discuss this head from any other claim head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.