Case 2602362/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Field v The QSS Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602362/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Field
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 14 October 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Victoria Butler therefore made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on 15 December 2022.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. The hearing listed for 17 to 19 June 2024 was cancelled. The extracted text does not set out any further liability reasoning or any separate finding by individual head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment text records a Rule 21 judgment that the claim succeeds, but does not break the outcome down by individual head of claim in the extracted text. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment text records a Rule 21 judgment that the claim succeeds, but does not break the outcome down by individual head of claim in the extracted text. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text records a Rule 21 judgment that the claim succeeds, but does not break the outcome down by individual head of claim in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.