Case 2602382/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Taylor v Specialist Education Support Network Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602382/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Lincoln
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Evans, sitting alone in Lincoln on 4 November 2019, held that Miss S Taylor's claims succeeded against Specialist Education Support Network Limited. The tribunal made separate awards for unlawful deductions from wages, holiday pay due on termination, and breach of contract.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £1,499.68 gross for unlawful deductions made from wages, £908.76 gross for holiday pay due on termination of employment, and £150 net for breach of contract. No separate findings, deductions, or additional remedy components were recorded in the written judgment beyond those amounts.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the face of the written decision, the material outcome is that all three claims were upheld and the total monetary award was £2,558.44.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as gross holiday pay due on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £909 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as net breach of contract compensation. | Upheld | — | £150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,558
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.