Case 2602385/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Martin v MS Stores (NI) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602385/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 19 October 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Victoria Butler decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not record the underlying liability facts or any substantive findings beyond the rule 21 default judgment. Remedy was not assessed in this decision; the tribunal directed that the remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, and the hearing listed for 10 to 12 June 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment was entered under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The extracted text does not set out the underlying factual allegations; it records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.