Case 2602423/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Morningstar v Advance Housing and Support Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602423/2022
- Decision date
- 11 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Morningstar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a preliminary hearing on 4 May 2023, the claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £500. The order was sent on 24 May 2023 and payment was due by 21 June 2023, but the claimant did not pay until 26 June 2023 and did not apply to vary the date.
Because the deposit was not paid in time, the tribunal struck out the complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and whistleblowing detriments under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearings listed for 8 August 2023 and 11 to 14 December 2023 were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to this complaint as 'constructive unfair dismissal' and says it was struck out under rule 39(4) after the deposit was not paid by the due date. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to 'whistleblowing detriments' and says these complaints were struck out under rule 39(4) after the deposit was not paid by the due date. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.