Case 2602424/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Clapham v Ashtead Plant Hire Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602424/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Clapham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 12 December 2019 before Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone, the claimant, Mr G Clapham, appeared in person and the respondent, Ashtead Plant Hire Company Limited, was represented by Mr S Swaine, solicitor. The written judgment records only a preliminary disposal of the redundancy payment claim.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had withdrawn his claim for a redundancy payment. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the redundancy payment claim. No findings were made on the substantive merits of that claim in this judgment.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to a final hearing in accordance with separate directions. No remedy was awarded in this decision, and the written record notes that reasons had been given orally so written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant stated that he had withdrawn his claim for a redundancy payment, and the tribunal therefore dismissed that claim. The written record also states that the remaining claims were to proceed to a final hearing under separate directions. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.