Case 2602433/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Buxton v Aberdeen House Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602433/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Buxton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Leicester Hearing Centre on 11 March 2020, Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone recorded that Ms L Buxton’s race discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination claims had been withdrawn. The judgment says those claims were dismissed because the claimant had withdrawn them.
The tribunal also noted that this did not affect her remaining claims, which would proceed in accordance with directions already given by the Tribunal. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the withdrawn claims.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the race discrimination claim was dismissed because the claimant had withdrawn it. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states that the sexual orientation discrimination claim was dismissed because the claimant had withdrawn it. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.