Claimant v A Cox — 2022

Case reference: 2602435/2021
Decision date: 7 January 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ayre Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

A Cox

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Ayre entered judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mr S Torabally against Ashley Cox. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages, had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay holiday entitlement and pension contributions. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages.	Upheld	—	£1,325
Breach of contract	The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice.	Upheld	—	£5,436
Redundancy	The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment.	Upheld	—	£14,688
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.	Upheld	—	£2,010
Breach of contract	The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's pension contributions in breach of contract.	Upheld	—	£3,669

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £27,129; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.