Case 2602446/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mrs P Parker (T/a Three Kings Inn) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602446/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
- Venue
- Lincoln
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing in Lincoln on 5 April 2023, Employment Judge Fredericks continued in the respondent’s absence under Rule 47 after waiting until 10:30am. The respondent’s application to extend time to file a response was refused, no response was accepted, and the respondent’s name was amended to Mrs Patricia Parker trading as Three Kings Inn after the claimant gave evidence that she had been employed by Mr and Mrs Parker personally and that Mr Parker was deceased.
The tribunal consequently found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £1,901.82 and a compensatory award of £14,246.57, made up of past losses of £6,294.86, future losses of £4,522.44, a 25% ACAS uplift of £2,929.27 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The total award was £16,148.39.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal award comprising a basic award of £1,901.82, compensatory losses of £6,294.86 past and £4,522.44 future, a 25% ACAS uplift of £2,929.27 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £16,148 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,148
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,902
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £14,247
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.