Case 2602451/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Herongrange Recruitment & Training Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602451/2022
- Decision date
- 10 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Broughton No
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJames Dunn brought claims against Herongrange Recruitment and Training Solutions Ltd, and the hearing was listed at Midlands East Employment Tribunal by CVP on 10 February 2023 before Employment Judge R Broughton. The respondent attended by Ms Malham, HR Manager, and Mr Sidwell attended as a witness. The claimant did not attend, and no application to adjourn or communication explaining his absence had been received by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal recorded that notice of the hearing had been sent to the postal address on the claim form on 10 November 2022, and that CVP joining details were emailed to the address on the claim form on 31 January 2023. It also noted that the claimant had failed to comply with the Tribunal's orders by not sending the documents relied on, a witness statement, or a schedule of loss. The Tribunal telephoned the claimant twice and emailed him during the hearing, but there was no response.
The full merits hearing was listed for two hours from 10:00am, and the Tribunal waited until 10:35am before proceeding. In all the circumstances, Employment Judge Broughton decided that dismissal under Rule 47 was in accordance with the overriding objective. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claimant's claim under Rule 47 after he failed to attend the full merits hearing. The written reasons do not separately determine the breach of contract claim on its merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claimant's claim under Rule 47 after he failed to attend the full merits hearing. The written reasons do not separately determine the unlawful deduction from wages claim on its merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.