Case 2602457/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Cox v Mrs Katina Dex — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602457/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Cox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment record from a hearing at Leicester before Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone on 29 November 2019. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Miss P Cox, appeared in person and that the respondent, Mrs Katina Dex, also appeared in person.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The extracted text does not identify each individual claim head, but the case listing supplied for this matter indicates redundancy, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues. No substantive findings on liability are recorded in the written judgment extract.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent's counterclaim was dismissed on withdrawal. No remedy was awarded. The record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment record states that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal, but it does not set out the individual claim heads. The case listing indicates redundancy, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment record states that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal, but it does not set out the individual claim heads. The case listing indicates redundancy, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment record states that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal, but it does not set out the individual claim heads. The case listing indicates redundancy, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim was also dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not identify the legal basis of the counterclaim in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.