Case 2602463/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Alyssa Taylor v Craft Ales & Cocktails — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602463/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Alyssa Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 13 October 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Clark Date made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on 8 February 2022. The judgment records that the claims succeed.
The tribunal did not set out the substantive allegations or make merits findings in this decision. It directed that remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 21 February 2022 at Nottingham with a one-day estimate, and stated that case management orders would follow separately.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The rule 21 judgment does not particularise this issue; the jurisdiction is taken from the case listing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The rule 21 judgment does not particularise this issue; the jurisdiction is taken from the case listing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Represents the written pay statement issue reflected in the case listing; the judgment itself records only that the claims succeed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.