Case 2602474/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Krejcova v A La Carte Recruitment — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602474/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Krejcova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Nottingham on 2 and 3 December 2021 before Employment Judge Victoria Butler sitting alone. The judgment records that the claimant, Ms D Krejcova, was represented in person with assistance, and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claims because it did not have jurisdiction to hear them. The written judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying allegations, and it does not record any monetary remedy or other substantive relief.
The judgment notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No panel members are listed because the case was heard by a judge sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The written judgment does not give separate merits reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The written judgment does not give separate merits reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The written judgment does not give separate merits reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.