Case 2602475/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gordon v Future Display and Shopfitting Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602475/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gordon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 remedy judgment heard remotely at Nottingham on 25 November 2021 before Employment Judge Victoria Butler sitting alone. The respondent, Future Display and Shopfitting Limited (in voluntary liquidation), did not attend. The tribunal recorded that Mr M Gordon had been unfairly dismissed and ordered payment of £550 for loss of statutory rights and £3,696 as a compensatory award, making £4,246 on the unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered the net sum of £282.03. It further found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the net sum of £600. The awards in the judgment therefore total £5,128.03.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment awards £550 for loss of statutory rights and £3,696 as a compensatory award. No separate basic award is expressly stated. | Upheld | — | £4,246 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and orders the net sum of £282.03. | Upheld | — | £282 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders the net sum of £600. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,128
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,696
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.