Case 2602482/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brittain v The Foody Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602482/2023
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brittain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Region of the Employment Tribunals on 11 October 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Ahmed decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. It does not set out the underlying factual findings or any monetary award in this decision, and no remedy figure is fixed at this stage.
The tribunal stated that remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 16 February 2024 at 10.00am.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out the substantive basis of the claim. It records that the claim succeeds under rule 21, with remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separate any monetary award between heads of claim. It records that the claim succeeds under rule 21, with remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.