Case 2602495/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Fassam v Md Retail Frontages Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602495/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Fassam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr C Fassam against Md Retail Frontages Ltd. Employment Judge Brewer recorded that the claimant was awarded £19,231.39, described as the sum made up in the schedule of loss and supporting documents sent to the respondent and the tribunal on 11 November 2019.
The extracted judgment text does not set out separate reasons, findings on liability, or a breakdown of the award between heads of loss. It also does not apportion the total between the listed claim types, so the public record should treat the award as an aggregate sum only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards a single sum under Rule 21 and does not split the £19,231.39 between claim types. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards a single sum under Rule 21 and does not split the £19,231.39 between claim types. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.