Case 2602506/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Trory v Neil Hughes — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602506/2020
- Decision date
- 3 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Trory
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Trory brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Neil Hughes. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years. On that basis, it held that he was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal proceedings.
The judgment also records that the claimant was given an opportunity to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out, but failed to do so. The tribunal accordingly struck out the whole claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the whole unfair dismissal claim because section 108 ERA 1996 requires at least two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but did not give an acceptable reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.