Case 2602508/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Majewska v Kl Invest (Boston) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602508/2019
- Decision date
- 9 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Majewska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Majewska was paid monthly under her contract at £1,194.88 gross, with £1,075 net after deductions. The tribunal found that Kl Invest Ltd did not issue itemised pay statements for February, March, April, May and June 2019, contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant made repeated requests and received some, but not all, of the outstanding statements; she remained without statements for February, March and May 2019. The tribunal recorded that the absence of statements caused disruption to her financial affairs, including her son’s student loan application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Declaration that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements required by s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for February, March and May 2019; the reasons also refer to missing statements for February, March, April, May and June 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.12(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.