Mrs E Scott v Waugh Petroleum Ltd — 2019

Case reference: 2602510/2019
Decision date: 30 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Adkinson

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs E Scott

Respondent

Waugh Petroleum Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a strike-out judgment, not a merits decision. On 5 December 2019 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying employment complaint.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing following the Tribunal's letter dated 5 December 2019.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.