Case 2602517/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Moran v Future Display and Shopfitting Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602517/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Moran
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Victoria Butler, sitting alone by CVP at Nottingham on 25 November 2021, determined the case under Rule 21 after the respondent, Future Display and Shopfitting Limited (in voluntary liquidation), did not attend. The judgment records that Mr P Moran was unfairly dismissed and orders the respondent to pay £550 for loss of statutory rights and a compensatory award of £6,323.51, making £6,873.51 on the unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £3,316 gross, and that it had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered £200 net. The judgment is a short remedy decision and does not set out detailed reasons beyond the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment ordered £550 for loss of statutory rights and a compensatory award of £6,323.51, totalling £6,873.51 on this claim. | Upheld | — | £6,874 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered a gross sum of £3,316. | Upheld | — | £3,316 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £200 net. | Upheld | — | £200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,390
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,324
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.