Case 2602528/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Wylie v Key Electrical Solutions Ltd (t/a Key Electrical) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602528/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Wylie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment is dated 16 January 2020 and was sent to the parties on 17 January 2020 by Employment Judge Clark.
No findings on the merits are recorded in the supplied text, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is marked as a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not identify the individual heads of claim in the text supplied. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not identify the individual heads of claim in the text supplied. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not identify the individual heads of claim in the text supplied. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.