Case 2602553/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Craig Bennison, In-house Barrister at Law — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602553/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a closed telephone preliminary hearing before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone on 13 January 2020. The claimant was Miss M Gordon and the respondent was Minster Care Group Limited. The only substantive disposal recorded in the judgment was that the religious discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the religious discrimination allegation. The record states that the claim was withdrawn, and that the remaining claims would continue. No findings are recorded on liability, remedy, or any monetary award.
Because the hearing was preliminary and judge-alone, there are no lay members listed and no legal test or substantive reasoning set out beyond the disposal of the withdrawn claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The record of a closed telephone preliminary hearing states: 'The claim of religious discrimination is dismissed upon withdrawal. The remaining claims continue.' No merits determination is recorded for this claim. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.