Mr P Wojtowicz v Bellway Homes Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 2602564/2019
Decision date: 10 September 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ahmed

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Wojtowicz

Respondent

Bellway Homes Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Ahmed recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement through ACAS by way of the COT3 procedure, and that the claimant withdrew his claim. The judgment is a Rule 52 withdrawal judgment and does not contain findings on the merits of the underlying breach of contract or unfair dismissal complaints.

The tribunal therefore dismissed the claimant’s proceedings. No monetary award or other substantive remedy was made, and the judgment gives no further factual or legal analysis beyond the withdrawal and dismissal.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment records that the parties had agreed terms of settlement through ACAS via the COT3 procedure and that the claimant withdrew his claim; the proceedings were then dismissed under rule 52.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the parties had agreed terms of settlement through ACAS via the COT3 procedure and that the claimant withdrew his claim; the proceedings were then dismissed under rule 52.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.