Case 2602598/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Nowland v J&Y Webber Services Limited (Creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602598/2018
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Nowland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Victoria Butler, sitting alone at Nottingham on 5 March 2020, held that Mrs M Nowland was not a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the disability discrimination complaint.
The only claim recorded in the written judgment was the disability discrimination claim against J & Y Webber Services Limited, and it was dismissed. The judgment states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would follow unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the Claimant was not a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time, so the disability discrimination claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- lack of jurisdiction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.