Case 2602617/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Demetriou v Storm Healthcare Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602617/2021
- Decision date
- 4 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Demetriou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Demetriou presented an ET1 on 16 October 2021 seeking 'other payments' in relation to what he described as a poorly handled suspension. He also claimed compensation for loss of earnings after a future job offer or employment opportunity was withdrawn, which he attributed to the respondent.
On 8 December 2021 Employment Judge Camp issued a provisional view that the claim should be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success and invited representations. The claimant later wrote to the tribunal on 4 January 2022 stating that he would not object to Judge Camp's position. The judgment records that the tribunal was satisfied the claim disclosed no cause of action for which the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction, and the claim was struck out in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The ET1 claimed 'other payments' arising from a 'poorly handled suspension' and sought compensation for loss of earnings said to follow a withdrawal of future employment. The judgment held the claim disclosed no cause of action within the Employment Tribunal's jurisdiction and struck it out in its entirety. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.