Case 2602619/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Anderson v R&S Construction Waste Disposal Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602619/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Anderson brought claims against R&S Construction Waste Disposal Limited for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and deductions from wages. At the hearing before Employment Judge Blackwell sitting alone in Leicester on 27 October 2020, the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were dismissed because the Claimant withdrew them.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claims in part. It found that the claim concerning alleged arrears of pay succeeded to the extent of a gross award of £128.00, and the claim concerning holiday pay succeeded with a gross award of £524.80. The respondent was therefore ordered to pay a total gross sum of £652.80.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded in part in respect of alleged arrears of pay; gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £128 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded; gross sum awarded for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £525 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £653
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.