Case 2602625/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gear v Keates Cleaning and Maintenance — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602625/2023
- Decision date
- 3 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gear
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The claim was issued in the Midlands East region of the Employment Tribunals on 23 October 2023, and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. It does not identify in the extracted text which specific pleaded claim or claims were determined, and it does not set out findings on liability beyond the Rule 21 default position.
Remedy was not decided in this judgment. The tribunal recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 3 April 2024 for three hours.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a Rule 21 default judgment and does not specify the underlying pleaded claim type(s) in the extracted text. It states that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.