Case 2602628/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Zimoch v Sutton PJ Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602628/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Zimoch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 23 October 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge McTigue determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis of the material before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £67.73. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded £203.19 for that claim. The judgment records a total award of £270.92.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for notice pay after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the tribunal proceeded under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £68 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the tribunal proceeded under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £203 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £271
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.