Case 2602644/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wareham v The Staffing Group t/a Single Resource Group — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602644/2019
- Decision date
- 15 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wareham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held at Leicester by Cloud Video Platform on 7 June 2021, Employment Judge Ahmed sat alone and heard the claimant in person and the respondent represented by solicitor Mr Marcus Difelice. The judgment is recorded as a preliminary hearing in case 2602644/2019.
The tribunal decided that the respondent’s application to strike out the claim was refused. The written record does not include any substantive merits findings on the underlying claim, and it states that case management orders for the future conduct of the case were issued separately.
The record also notes that the hearing was remote, that the parties did not object to that format, and that it was not practicable to hold a face-to-face hearing because of the Covid-19 pandemic. It further records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At a preliminary hearing on 7 June 2021, the tribunal refused the respondent’s application to strike out the claim. The written record does not determine any substantive employment claim on the merits. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.