Case 2602665/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Arikan v Veli’s Wholesale Doner Kebab Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602665/2023
- Decision date
- 21 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Arikan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Arikan was employed by Veli’s Wholesale Doner Kebab Limited in his second period of employment from 28 October 2019 until his dismissal on 10 October 2023. The tribunal found that he was not dismissed during the telephone call on 4 October 2023; that call concerned the validity of his fit note and sick pay, and the tribunal preferred the respondent’s evidence on the disputed events.
The tribunal held that the principal reason for dismissal was conduct. It relied on the claimant’s unauthorised absences in September 2023, the submission of a fit note that covered a day he had worked, his refusal to sign the updated health and safety document until he eventually relented, his refusal to sign the updated contract without explaining his concerns, and his lateness, early departures, and attitude to management instructions. Earlier warnings from prior years were referred to as showing a pattern of behaviour, but the dismissal was found to be based on conduct during the second period of employment.
The tribunal found that the respondent had a reasonable belief in misconduct, had carried out a reasonable investigation, and had followed a fair procedure. The claimant was invited to a disciplinary hearing, given the material relied on, allowed the right to be accompanied, told the outcome in writing, and given an appeal. The tribunal also took account of the respondent’s small size and lack of HR or legal advice. It concluded that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal fair and held that the claimant was dismissed on 10 October 2023 for conduct; no monetary award was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- reasonable grounds for belief
- reasonable investigation
- range of reasonable responses
- equity and the substantial merits of the case
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.