Case 2602684/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Godding v NBJ (London) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602684/2018
- Decision date
- 8 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer
- Venue
- Leicester
- Panel members
- Mrs C A Pattisson, Ms R Wills
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Godding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leicester on 27 January 2020, before Employment Judge Brewer with lay members Mrs C A Pattisson and Ms R Wills, the tribunal entered judgment on consent in Mrs T Godding's case against NBJ (London) Ltd. The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed on the terms of the attached consent order.
The consent order records that the parties had agreed terms in full and final settlement of the claim. The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £2,500 without admission of liability by 4pm on 28 January 2020, payment to be made to the claimant's solicitors. The order states that the settlement also resolved any other claims arising out of the claimant's employment or its termination, subject only to excepted claims for accrued pension rights or latent personal injury.
The judgment contains no findings on liability, no reasons on the merits, and no legal analysis beyond recording the consent disposal. It therefore reflects a settlement-based dismissal rather than any substantive determination of the underlying complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying time-off complaint in the text available; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context. The claim was dismissed on the terms of a consent order recording full and final settlement. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed on the terms of the attached consent order. No merits finding was made. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.