Case 2602684/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Elliot v Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602684/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Members
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Mr J Hill, Mr G Edmundson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Elliot
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Nottingham by Cloud Video Platform on 12 to 19 October 2020 before Employment Judge Hutchinson with lay members Mr J Hill and Mr G Edmundson, gave a unanimous judgment that the maternity/pregnancy discrimination claims were withdrawn and dismissed. It also held that the disability discrimination claims failed and were dismissed, and that the claim of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy figures are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal recorded these claims as withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.