Case 2602690/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Paterson v Bosch Thermotechnology Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602690/2022
- Decision date
- 20 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Paterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the tribunal issued a letter dated 10 February 2023 giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's Order dated 14 November 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 24 February 2023 was vacated and did not take place.
The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type, nor does it record any remedy or substantive findings on liability beyond the strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.